Use dexterity, deductional skill and research to reconstruct Richard’s past. Take on the role of journalist Richard Nolan, as well as five additional playable characters. Explore a world with a rich and unique visual style, combining realistic environments with low-poly characters. Unravel a global conspiracy in a society of ubiquitous digitalism, surveillance and transhumanism. Dive into a multi-layered Sci-Fi thriller, where dystopian reality and digital utopia are intertwined. Experience an alarmingly realistic vision of the near future. This domestic drama evolves into a thriller about a worldwide conspiracy, which at its core aims to determine the fate of humanity: Could a perfect digital utopia be the answer? A virtual paradise not affected by material needs and quarrels? Could a super-AI be our savior – or would it simply declare us as dispensable since it could not be taught the value of philanthropy What will the world look like after this storm, what will remain of humanity? Instead, they find themselves right at the center of it. When he wakes up in hospital after an explosion and finds that his wife and son have mysteriously vanished, Richard realizes: he and his family have become more than just bystanders in a storm of rivaling ideas pertaining humankind’s salvation between dystopian reality and digital utopia. Richard Nolan is one of the few journalists openly criticizing this development. Drones and humanoid robots replace humans in the public sector, everything is interconnected, surveillance has become omnipresent. Governments and companies promise remedies through technological progress. Lack of resources, illnesses caused by polluted air and water, crime on the rise, war. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.Berlin, 2048 – The world is on the brink. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. 
This appallingly cruel perspective has a long history in the United States despite its patent falsity, going far beyond the “blaming the victim” nonsense furthered by allegedly liberal social scientists and providers of social services (including social workers, psychotherapists, counselors, and other purveyors of the “helping” professions). People in poverty in the United States are largely viewed as individually responsible for their own economic circumstances, and they must be punished in this view (see Ryan 1976 and Schneider 1999 for representative takes on the issue). They are poor because, in America’s dominant culture, there is something wrong with them emotionally, morally, subculturally, or behaviorally. People who are poor are not poor because they lack money. American dominant culture understands poverty as a defect of character, not a result of a structurally unjust economic system.
0 kommentar(er)
